ARP Votes to Cut
Fraternal Ties With EPC

The Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church (ARP) voted June 10 to end their fraternal relationship with the Evangelical Presbyterian Church.

During the 222nd meeting of the General Synod in Flat Rock, N.C., the Inter-Church Relations Committee recommended that the ARP sever its ties with the EPC amid growing concern about leadership and denominational structure, women in ministry, and the promotion of charismatic gifts in ministry. The recommendation was approved with no debate or discussion from the floor.

“The ARP Inter-Church committee has instructed our representatives to have open and frank discussions with their EPC brothers about the situation in the EPC and to be in prayer with them,” the committee reported to the Synod. “The reasons for this include concerns about the nature of how leadership is wielded in the denominational structure of the EPC, growing support and hardening of the promotion of women in ministerial and elder offices, and continued concerns with the likewise promotion and support of charismatic gifts. We continue to pray for renewal within the EPC.”

The Synod action ended a fraternal relationship that began in 1985 when the EPC and ARP established a fraternal relationship and exchanged delegates at annual meetings. In 1991 the two denominations considered union, but decided for committees of both bodies to continue meeting for exploring ministry collaboration — particularly fruitful was the shared Church Planter Assessment Center (CPAC) that evaluated church planter candidates for the ARP and EPC.

Rev. Ben Glaser, who served as chair of the Inter-Church Relations committee of the ARP, wrote on his June 12 blog commenting on the ARP Synod vote to cut ties with the EPC: “The ARP was the first denomination to recognize the new EPC which had come out of the Northern Presbyterian Church before the merger of the UPCUSA and the PCUS in 1983. Our Synod had sent several letters of concern, and had met with representatives of the EPC, about the rising rigidity of the EPC on women’s ordination, charismatic gifts, centralizing of institutional authority, and the recent flirting with Side B Christianity. However, there was no discussion on the floor. Speaking to members of our Synod about it later it was evident that there was unanimity to the need for this action, that we had done what we could do as a body to witness to our concerns.” Glaser noted that a member of Synod offered a prayer for the EPC.

The ARP currently maintains fraternal relationships with the Korean-American Presbyterian Church, the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA), the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America; the Evangelical Presbyterian Church of England and Wales; the Free Church of Scotland, the United Reformed Churches, and the Canadian Reformed Churches.

8 responses

  1. Rev. GJ Gerard Avatar
    Rev. GJ Gerard

    While the 2026 General Synod of the ARPC voted, without any discussion or dissension, to approve the Recommendation of its InterChurch Relations Committee to end direct fraternal relations with the EPC, there are still indirect fraternal relations through joint membership in the World Reformed Fellowship (WRF). The ARPC also has direct fraternal relations with the ARP Synod of Mexico (IPAR), the ARP Synod of Pakisrtan and the newly constituted ARP Synod of Canada (which at present is only a Presbytery).

  2. Samuel Donald Fortson Avatar
    Samuel Donald Fortson

    The ARP made the decision at their 2026 Synod meeting just a week before the EPC GA met. They made this decision after sending s letter to our Stated Clerk in fall of 2023 to register concerns with the EPC. I was on the Permanent Fraternal Relations Committee at the time of this letter and wrote a response that our Stated Clerk approved. I went to the ARP Synod with Allen Roes (former EPC Moderator) and spoke to the Synod explaining our positions (June 2024). After the ARP Synod, Allen and I also met in Charlotte with ARP Principal Clerk and Chair of Inter-church Relations. We had a cordial and honest discussion. We invited the ARP Principal Clerk to address the Central Carolinas Presbytery which he did. The ARP were aware of our discussions related to Greg Johnson, and the ARP Principal Clerk attended the Central Carolinas Presbytery when we had our debate about the PNW overture – which easily passed. After observing the debate, the Principal Clerk commented to me that there were no biblical arguments coming from the side opposed to the PNW which troubled him. I’m sure the ARP will send us a formal letter communicating their action at some point. This news article simply reported what had happened at the ARP Synod of 2026.

  3. Douglas Kortyna Avatar
    Douglas Kortyna

    That’s incorrect as Jeff has stated. I would kindly ask you to report the facts even from a brother that voted no to all of the AIC proposals. We can do better than this article.

    1. Peter Larson Avatar
      Peter Larson

      Douglas: Please tell me what was incorrect about our reporting? I asked a question in the comments section, but that is different from the news article reported by the Plumb Line. I was seeking clarification with my question, not reporting.

  4. Douglas Kortyna Avatar

    I’m the chair of the Permanent Fraternal Relations Committee. I received no such correspondence from Ben Glaser about the ARP and their decision. Moreover, I have been on the committee for roughly a year and a half. How can a church body make a formal decision without reaching out to the current chair of the committee to even notify them?

    1. Peter larson Avatar
      Peter larson

      Hi, Doug. I just noticed your comment. I understand you reported the ARP action to cut ties at your standing committee meeting during GA so you must have been notified. I also heard you decided not to disclose the rationale for the ARP action because it might harm the unity of the EPC. Can you please confirm that for the record and comment?

      1. Jeff Avatar
        Jeff

        Peter – that’s incorrect. I attended the standing committee meeting, and all of the members (including Doug) confirmed there was no communication from ARP.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.